I am extremely confident about the model, Tommy. If there was any math to deliver, I would provide it to you in a jiffy. But you are asking me something illogical. Models contain math; they are not math themselves. As such, all we need is a mind that understands models. Allow me to explain this in one sentence because models are not based on math:

Do we have a 1 that is found inside a 0, or do we have a 0 found inside a 1?

You see that this is extremely important information and at the same time this is not a mathematical issue.

You are asking me something that you are not asking from the Black Hole model. So, your question is impolite by itself.

A model is not based on math but on the idea that there is indeed an invisible mass collapsed onto itself behind a horizon. Or that there is indeed nothing material there at all!

Not a single shred of scientific evidence exists for the invisible mass of the Black Hole model itself. Nothing at all. It just uses data/evidence and mathematical calculation to support the model. So, the model declares that the Black Hole is there and this is therefore a self-fulfilling prophecy. What we do have data/evidence for is the gravitational monster, but not for that invisible mass itself.

The other model, the Black Eye model, declares that the gravitational outcome we see indeed is caused by all (or many) masses in the galaxy. It is a collective outcome, a synergistic result. There is no matter that collapsed onto itself behind a scientific horizon: all is scientifically detected already.

Yes, there will be math if so desired, but that is not the interesting part because the math will be about the various aspects inside the model.

Once we agree there are two models (until one has been shown to be correct through actual evidence of the location itself), then who cares about the math? That is truly not the interesting question.

Which model is correct depends on the actual evidence which we must collect first. Or… it depends on Occam’s Razor. In that case, the Black Eye model is simpler and better because we do not need to accept Santa in the model. The Black Eye model is based on everything we can see and measure. The Black Hole model contains Santa with an invisible mass.

Thank you for your reply.