The decimal system is just one system, and 2 takes in an important spot. However, the binary system is another mathematical system, capable of declaring everything in the universe, numerically. It does not contain a number two (though we can create a number two using binary language).

There is also another system, but it is extremely simple and has just a few members: the 1-system. It contains just one number: 1. Nothing else.

Words that fit the category are Universe, Everything, Mankind, Life, Whole, God, All, Nature and probably a few more. The words using this system do not declare any details; they exist at the overall level only and seem to entail it all (but lack the depth themselves).

A fun numerical aspect to contemplate: three does also not exist (not as an outcome with three identically important parts).

Spacetime is a concept; it basically is a tool, and Einstein devised it mostly correctly, but the ones coming after Einstein did not use his framework correctly. They ended up wagging the dog.

Take a tape measure and declare that it was involved with how tall you grew. Everyone laughing of course. Even though the tape measure is correctly pronouncing your height, it was not involved with how tall you grew.

Same for Spacetime. Its correctness has nothing to do with it actually being involved with the behavior(s) of matter. Notice immediately how we have a system about the behavior(s) of matter and how Spacetime is literally a word that has nothing to do with behavior of matter. Einstein picked a truly incorrect word, but did so because he did not know where to hang hit hat.

Had he called it the Fourth Motion, he would have been in the ball park.

Newton captured all behavior explained by gravity, but there is behavior that is not based on gravity. The catapulting motion of the materialization process (the fastest we ourselves are involved in) is not based on gravity. Yet matter involved with a speed will always show its signature.

Thank you for your article. A fun read, but I did not agree with all because there is more than what was captured in your article.

If interested:

'The Fourth Motion of Matter'

https://medium.com/@fred-rick/the-fourth-motion-of-matter-393718a67fdf