The faulty words in your words are:

Absolutely complete.

Gödel already proved about 100 years ago that the wrong words to use in order to get to the highest level of understanding everything we witness are 'absolute' and 'complete'.

No axioms exist that can be brought to the highest level and remain true for that highest level.

So, you did not get the finer point I made. You misread my words. You did not get it.

One cannot start the story from Nothing.

One cannot start the story from our current Everything.

One must start with a prior condition that undermined itself.

Then, the completeness is found with the mechanical explanation how the material outcomes occurred. One cannot explain how the prior condition started to exist itself; only how it will have undermined itself.

Thank you for your response. I do appreciate it.