Sitemap

The Theory of Creation

4 min readJun 16, 2025

--

A view on how we came to be.

Photo by Humberto Arellano on Unsplash

In the Big Whisper model, creation is not the creation of energy but, rather, the creation of matter from some of that energy.

There may be other theories about creation, but this is the Big Whisper model (a modified Big Bang model).

Note the orange storyline of the Big Whisper model

In essence, once we have creation, then there must be two other realities accepted as well.

  1. There was an original state
  2. It broke.

One-time events are negative events. It means that anything that can occur just once will have been the result of an undermining of what existed prior.

  • Break a vase, and it cannot break a second time.

The pieces may get broken a second time, but that is not the same as a vase breaking a second time, which is simply not possible.

It’s actually quite interesting how the Big Whisper model explains matter.

Due to an orange storyline, proposed to be collective inward motion that did not stop moving inwardly, some of all that energy ended up being damaged during the (temporary) establishment of extreme conditions.

It is impossible for all immaterial energy to end up being damaged.

  • One cannot have a fundamentally original 100% state becoming a fundamentally 100% distinct state — that is simply not possible. A second and fundamentally distinct 100% state would automatically revert, immediately or within 15 seconds, back to the original 100% state.

So, there was a fundamental breaking up of the original state. The subsequent state (our universe today) is therefore varied, with some parts damaged, and other parts remaining as they already existed. All these parts cannot get back to becoming one again.

To say this in scientific language that is used to describe something vitally important about energy:

  1. We can start with energy in a closed system.
  2. Then, something negative happened, a breaking up occurred, and now we have two closed systems.

As you can tell, the energy system, overall, is still closed overall in the result. But there are now two systems that are more or less totally exclusive of one another.

At the subatomic level, this would then mean:

  • Closed system of damaged energy (quarks -> neutrons and protons)
  • Closed system of remaining undamaged energy (from which the electrons are pulled)

In effect, that would mean that matter follows then two distinct storylines:

  1. The neutrons and protons are damaged energy. The neutrons and protons are located in the atomic center.
  2. The electrons are material only because the positive charge of the protons established a negative aspect into the otherwise immaterial energy field. The electrons are not-located in the atomic center and behave totally distinct from the neutrons and protons.

Note how both systems remain closed. The electron did not become part of the proton; it is simply a reaction in the remaining immaterial closed system to the charge of the proton, one that does not overcome the positive charge.

A neutralization of the positive charge occurred therefore at the overall level, but the positive charge did not get neutralized at the specific level.

For creation, the living format of creation, one could say that this means that we are alive because of the electrons added into the neutron/proton environment.

  • The electrons are not damaged, they are part of the original state of energy, even if we accept that this original state did get undermined.

We, human beings, are our electrons, existing until we die, found together with the protons that are part of our bodies. We wake up in the same body every morning, because the electrons cannot leave our protons and decide to go somewhere else overnight.

We are our neutrons, our protons, and our electrons.

The negative one-time event also put the entire energy/matter of the Milky Way on its singular trajectory through space (while a variety of circular motions are -as we know- part of the resulting outcomes of the galaxy).

Two things to declare about this:

  1. The Milky Way is the largest actively sustained setting in which we exist. There are larger settings like the Local Group, though that setting is sustained passively by the Big Bang motion. The Milky Way is our largest neighborhood in which we are connected.
  2. The Milky Way did not derive from the center of the one-time event. This large collective derived from a very specific spot in the Big Whisper/Big Bang event. In the model, this is declared to be part of Zone 2 (and therefore not part of Zone 1 in the center, nor part of the very large Zone 3 all around). In short: All energy/matter of the Milky Way received the same treatment in this one-time event and is therefore a collective. All received the same retracting/catapulting action, part of one specific area moving in the exact same direction at the same speed.

Creation is a process. We start out with the egg; the egg broke, and the result is an omelet from which the eggshells are seemingly missing.

--

--

Responses (2)