The truth is always expressed in a known context. Blue is distinct in the paint store and different when on the couch with the shrink. Yet neither becomes approximations; they are well understood in their specific settings.

If we jump to the universal level, then we must realize it is the universe that is of a non-factual level. We use it as a concept only to grasp all there is, including even all we do not grasp.

Write your name on an envelope, address, city, country, planet Earth, Solar System, Milky Way, and Universe, and the one word that stands out is Universe because it is non-functional for the postal person. The word Universe on the envelope declares nothing functional for the postal person.

That means that all scientific information we have is correct ONLY at the sub-universal level, and NEVER at the universal level. Somehow, physicists are not capable of wrapping their minds around this because they are detail specialists and not general specialists. They are not trained in structural thinking. They focus on the baby and throw out the bathwater not knowing there could be two babies in the bathwater.

Benjamin makes an excellent point because physicists need to learn that they operate in a biased environment where the big picture is concerned. They refuse to break the egg inside their head about the largest level: they have to recognize that there is no (active) functionality to it and stop thinking there may be something about the universe as a whole that they have not discovered.

Thanks, Aaron. Aways good to communicate with you.