Then do declare what is wrong, Burton. Right now, you did not say anything real. You just said "I disagree" and then you remained silent. That is cowardly.
What I am trying to show is that the minute we enter the largest level of reality, then we always have two options to declare what we see.
In one simple analogy, it is like having twenty scientific dots, and the request to get a Face out of connecting the twenty dots. In this example, we get two different options to do so, and only one will be correct.
A: What I see scientists do is create a Cyclops with their connecting the dots. There are indeed two ears, two nostrils, a forehead, mouth and chin, so perfectly fine. Yet the single eye is an artificial component that does not belong to a real Face. A brain fart is included in the outcome.
B: Because I am an amateur in science, I'll declare my connecting the twenty dots as a Gorilla. It is not yet the human Face we would like to see as end result, but at least there are two eyes. Imperfect as it is, all components of the outcome are natural components.
--
Once you see this difference that the brain can establish at the largest of levels, then we can take a closer look at, for instance, the clocks sent into space and the data they provided us. These clocks came back to us with a different time on their displays compared to clocks left here on Earth. This different outcome can also be explained in two manners, and again only one of them will be correct:
A: Time dilated
B: Matter's behavior changed.
#A is not a natural explanation (it is part of a larger framework). Meanwhile, #B is the natural outcome, and this is all easy to show.
Tape Measure and Time Measure are the tools, the man-made measurements we established to capture distance and time passage.
Subject Matter (two examples):
1: a person measured with the tape measure, and
2: matter's behavior measured with the time measure.
For some reason, physicists ended up wagging the dog. Instead of sticking with the subject matter that Newton and Einstein were involved in (the behavior of matter, such as Mercury's revolution around the sun), they switched subject matter on us.
They focused on time as the medium changing, not matter.
That is like saying that the tape measure changes (stretches) when people are getting older because we need a lower number of tape measurements to measure up these now older and shorter people.
In reality, the subject matter is and remains the person, and is never the instrument. The reason the person shrunk has nothing to do with the tape measure at all. Nothing.
Time dilating is saying that the instrument changed behavior and affects the material.
Einstein did nothing wrong. His framework was about the behavior of matter and he used the clocks to show that. Really, nothing wrong here. But to say that time dilated in reality (instead of being the expression within this framework), that is the spot where the dog got wagged.
The dog wagging its tail, the correct manner of presenting things:
Matter changes behavior when placed in a different spatial setting.
So, my challenge to you, Burton, while it is perfectly fine to disagree with me, is to communicate what you see, so I can show you where the intellectual knot is twisted.
