This is nonsensical, Tim. Your model is off, not by a little but by a lot. The Black Hole model is off already, and yours is off twice.

Let's get this straight: We start out with gravity, which is an invisible force. Yet to add the idea that matter can collapse onto itself and then becomes undetectable for our scientific instruments is a laughable idea. That is exactly what a priest would be saying, not a scientist.

A priest starts with a model, an idea. Then, the priest collects evidence that supports the model, the idea.

A scientist collects evidence first and then theorizes about a model. A scientist would not add an aspect that cannot be shown to exist scientifically to the collected evidence. A Black Hole is not based on good scientific structures; it contains a religious aspect.

The Black Eye model is simpler because it starts with the invisible gravitational force and declares nothing special otherwise. Everything is readily observed by our scientific instruments and all it points out is that there can be a collective outcome to gravity when there are many masses, such as in a galaxy.

'Why a Black Hole is a Laughable Idea'

https://fred-rick.medium.com/why-a-black-hole-is-a-laughable-idea-4721391bdca2