To get attention, one must sometimes call the smartest the dumbest, Cliff.

Now that this idea has attention, I can go back to the original position of saying that a force is always invisible and that specific results can therefore be explained in two different ways (until the final truth is known).

Either a collapsed mass exists beyond a scientific horizon, or the collective of masses in a galaxy cause the gravitational phenomenon.

What makes physicists 'dumb' is that they picked one model to agree on and are silence about all other options.

--

In a binary star system, we have three gravitational centers. One with each mass, and one with the barycenter between both stars. No one envisions a collapsed mass in the middle.

With a ten-star system, we have eleven gravitational centers. No one envisions a collapsed mass in the middle.

So, why did physicists change models when they went from ten stars in a system to 100,000,000 stars in a system. All of a sudden, there is a collapsed mass in the center.

Explain that to me, Cliff. Why would physicists change models halfway?