We are equals in the voting booth, but not in the results. We can vote, but our votes are not translated into an equal result. Winners take all in mostly Anglo nations. We can change that today, because the Framers did not put a winner-take-all voting system in place in the USA. I'll explain in one minute of reading.

The Framers put winner-take-all in place for President and Senator elections.

But for all other elections (including local and State elections), they actually demanded voter equality. Equal participation (which we have) plus remaining each other's equals in the results (which we do not have). This demand for voter equality did not happen in the original US Constitution, but in the Bill of Rights.

The Fourteenth Amendment declares our privileges (which includes voting) as something that should not be abridged.; it also declares that we should be equals before the law. In combination: voter equality, both in process and result.

Thomas Jefferson already devised a system of Full Representation, so this was known in their days already.

What happened?

The States did not want to hand out political freedom, even though that is exactly what they signed on to, but the State powers that be wanted to be as strong as possible instead.

Illegally, they implemented winner-take-all at the state elections, and illegally they made it verboten for local elections to use the Full Representation format.

Come join Local Revolutions grassroots organization. We can take care of the inequality in our voting booths at the local levels (a good start), at the State level (a good goal to aim for once we dealt with the local elections), but not for Presidential and Senator elections (but our political freedom will end up trickling up, so we are then good at this level, too). No need to change the US Constitution therefore. It is fine as is; it just needs to be followed to the letter.

'Voting -- is it a Scam?'

https://fred-rick.medium.com/voting-is-it-a-scam-415ced788288