Member-only story
Scientists are using a religious model!
Rubber trees growing in Alaska? You gotta be kidding me. That’s not possible. But true it is — just as soon as we built greenhouses in Alaska and brought some rubber plants in from Brazil. It’s called planted evidence.
The Big Bang theory contains planted evidence, too. The super-hot conditions proposed in the Lambda-CDM, the most popular version of the Big Bang, are planted evidence. The super-hot conditions were imported from the laboratory and the Hadron Collider, used to examine matter to its finest details. Subsequently, the super-hot conditions got transplanted to the theory.
Is it horrible to import evidence? Not really. But one needs to be careful to use a scientific model when importing evidence. Religious aspects may follow unnoticed. Using a belief in a scientific model (for instance, stating that all goes back to some kind of divine singularity) and things can get placed rather quickly in the wrong scientific spots.
— -
The easiest way to see what’s wrong with the Big Bang theory is by comparing it to another theory about the same subject matter. In this case, the Big Whisper theory (containing a hypothesis as a center feature); it is an excellent way to find the discrepancy, though in many ways the Big Whisper is similar to…
