Why did you not discuss Motion as originator of waves, and only declared Gravity to be the originator?
The material universe we now live in was birthed in an Action. This action was not based on gravity.
If we take the proto-Force, then we can establish a setup that is the starting point for the outbound motion we recognize among all matter. In other words, we can have a proto-Force built up an extreme level of tension. Yet that proto-Force could then not let go of that extreme level of tension and -voila- we have matter. That is an incomplete assumption.
The story is not: A --> B
The story is A --> A' --> B
We must have the in-between step as well; we cannot exist in a result and have that result derive from a single step of transformation. That would not be possible.
With A, we can envision the proto-Force. But we cannot get to B, unless the situation of A ended up being setup for destroying the intact A foundation.
Inbound motion can and will destroy parts when the inbound motion is not stopped. And that is exactly what we are looking for. This is the in-between step.
A --> A' through the destruction of parts of the inbound motion established by the proto-Force.
This A' is then both the prior reality and the newly established reality. It is the original vase shattering on its selfcreated floor of destruction.
Then, with the destruction of the setup, like a mechanism wound up too much so it broke, we end up with a reaction, and not an action based on the Force, but on the established outcome of the Force, a major distinction.
A --> A'
A' --> B
The proto-Force was destroyed, like a broken toy no longer capable of performing its trick any longer. The parts still performing what they can, like matter now displaying the original Force in four distinct manners (Gravity the collective force of the separate parts).
Before there was Gravity, there was Motion.
The fastest Motion we are involved in is based on that original Motion. It is not based on Gravity. Gravity is involved with spin of planet, revolution around Sun, and circling within the Milky Way. So, yes, Gravity does play its important role at various very important levels. Yet Gravity is not associated with the strongest, fastest Motion we are involved in.
Why did you not discuss Motion as the prime mover of the fastest speed we are still involved in today, Areeba? Why do you call out the Waves as Gravitational and do you not point to the original (re)action of our material universe?
