Why, Pedro, are you standing at the doorstep, and yet not entering your home?
Answer: because you are using a tool (your brain) and you want to bring your brain in with you.
That is like driving a car and then wanting to park the car in your living room.
You are engaged in a faux pas.
I'll do my best to show you what you are not doing correctly. You may not get it. Your brain may be in the way (while you have to use your brain nevertheless to understand the following).
--
Write your name on an envelope, your address, city, country, planet Earth, Solar System, Milky Way, Universe, and hand the letter to the postal person.
The postal person will deliver the letter to the right person (in this case that is you), but mentions that of the 8 items, only 7 items provided directions.
The word Universe provided nothing the postal person could use. Nothing at all.
--
Now, let's go to Gödel, who said exactly the same:
The word Universe is not a word that the postal person can use to deliver a letter.
But... as you know, Gödel used different methods to declare that. It is the same, however. The universe is a non-entity. It exists as a noun inside our heads. It does not exist as a unit out there in reality. It is a collective, not based on a foundation. It has many foundations, not just one.
--
Now we move on to you and many others, who still have the universe on their brain as an entity. That is a fallacy, and you may not be able to accept that as correct right away.
You are creating a brain fart when you consider the universe a unit. Then, it appears all logical when in reality it is not.
It is like existing on a shard of a broken vase, and then declaring the vase is still whole. It is like saying the omelet is still a whole egg.
In other words: You are not telling yourself the truth. You are embracing a reality that is not self-based, and yet you approach it as if it is self-based.
--
Gödel was smart, but not smart enough. He showed how there is no truth at the universal level, and next (on Einstein's 70th birthday no less) he showed how the Gödel Metric is equal to Einstein's Spacetime, albeit in a distinct manner. Einstein was flabbergasted and had to agree that it was correct.
That is the paradox:
Gödel showed how there is no universal level for any scientific or mathematical use, and yet he placed his Metric at an unnatural level, just like Einstein had picked an unnatural Spacetime framework.
It does not matter that their work was correct.
Paint the most accurate facial aspects on a piece of paper, and have everything be correct, except for forgetting to use two eyes and using just one eye instead. Place that eye in the middle of the forehead.
Everything in detail is completely correct.
But the Cyclops is not real. There are no Cyclopes ever, nor will there ever be. A Cyclops is a faux pas, unless we want to live in a virtual reality in which we are having some fantasy fun?
--
Do you get it?
Your brain is in the way. It accepts a truth that is a lie. You need to investigate the structures of your word. There are truths there, and there are falsehoods, and you appear to not be aware of the distinction.
Infinity is not a scientific word. The context in which infinity exists is available only in the following two realms:
* Space
* Artificial reality
Scientists would love to make Space a scientific entity, but they can't. They use fabrications like Spacetime and other ideas to capture Space, but they fail at it miserably.
Since Newton, we can use infinity within the tools we embraced. We can have our computer app use infinity, and lead us to wonderful outcomes.
Yet this is not the actual scientific realm.
Just like the word God is not a scientific word, the word Infinity is also not a scientific word. There are no axioms to Infinity that place it on a scientific foundation.
So, please, walk through the door. Don't just stand there. Get in, but do not bring your car into the living room. It does not belong there.
