Wow, Benjamin, you are fully eating up the script that physicists use nowadays to explain the gravitational monsters we see in the center of galaxies, right?
Looks like you took the bait.
I showed you the structural realities of 1 and 0, and you seemed to take it in. So following physicists into a Black Hole is quite the surprise. I'll explain what is not right about Black Holes.
I'll use an analogy with the Eye of the Storm first, for easy recognizing what they are doing.
There are two options to look at the Eye of the Storm:
A/ The Eye controls the Storm
B/ The Storm establishes the Eye
One is correct and the other is wagging the dog. Yes, option A is wagging the dog.
I hope you see right away why physicists calling the gravitational monsters out as Black Holes is funny:
They picked the wrong structure. They are wagging the dog.
On top of that, they say that there is an actual mass in that center. Plus, to top this cake off with home-made whip cream, they say that the mass is invisible. No normal person would say that the Eye of the Storm has an invisible mass inside it.
It could not be funnier.
A galaxy has a lot of mass in it, and collectively they can be seen as the Storm. While there is of course a gravitational pull toward all directions, the gravitational pull becomes collective in the very center, and it becomes enormously strong.
The Eye of the Storm is a depression. The Storm pulls on the center with all its might, and none of the winds can make it to the center. One can light up a Cuban cigar in the Eye of the Storm (and wait for the Wall of the Eye to make you more nauseous than that cigar ever can).
There is no wind in the Eye, blue skies above, but there is air in the Eye, regular air, though depressed.
The center of a galaxy is a depression in light of gravity. It is a gravitational depression of the greatest order.
In the Eye of the Storm there is no wind, yet the Wall of the Eye packs the biggest wind gusts ever measured on the planet.
The very center of a galaxy, the exact center is a net-zero spot for gravity. Yet right at the edge where the net-zero fails to remain net-zero, that is where the mightiest gravitational force exists in the entire galaxy.
It is so strong that not even light photons can move through it (hence a Black Eye).
Around the Eye we see a lit-up ring because these are all the photons thrown off course -- into our direction.
Benjamin, you are so smart not to believe everything other people tell you. You wrote an excellent article on beliefs and our human nature. And yet you fell for the belief that physicists present you. They built theory upon theory upon theory, and that last step did simply not acknowledge the option of wagging the dog.
Naturally, these physicists do not believe they are wagging the dog and defend their position with the strongest weapons they have (and if that doesn’t work, then they us their silence).
You have heard of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems, right?
He showed with these theorems that one cannot come to a completeness, no matter which system one uses.
Physics is a system. It is not based on everything there is, but on looking at everything using the cleanest method possible.
And that leads to an Incompleteness, no matter its cleanliness, just as Gödel predicted. Ask me about it and I can provide a simple example to show you that Gödel was absolutely right (even though he later showed that he may not have understood fully what he discovered).
It means that once we find an overall state, an overall condition, a point of maximized reality, then there are always two ways to look at this -- and one of the ways will be wagging the dog.
--
Other than that, I know exactly what you are saying in this article, and again I admire your very smart brain quite a bit.
But apparently you are gullible. You fell for this one, both eyes open.
