Yes, all makes sense. But you are still using a concept that cannot be used.

We can study electrons to get as close as we can to understand original energy, but that is as close as we can get at the detailed level.

At the overall level, we can also study original energy. Yet we must accept that Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems are correct.

Either way we study original energy, we will come to an incompleteness which points the arrow at ourselves, at our brains. We are fully limited by ourselves, by our brains needing to use formats to describe the material universe.

Said differently, original energy is still part of the current state of the universe, but its foundation is not based on the current state of the universe.

We must accept that there is a prior state with its own foundation that experienced a major breakdown. As such, we cannot establish a foundation in our current state of the universe because it will always be incomplete.

Understanding energy is therefore not based on motion because motion in the material universe is distinct from the motion of the original energized state and may even include motions and non-motions of unknown qualities.

We are made of matter, so we are already distinct from original energy. We are one step away from original energy, though we are influenced by it as well. Part of the original energy is still there, but we cannot see it all that clearly. We will never be able to see it all that clearly, but we can find generic truths.

To describe them, we must avoid using concepts other than as pointers. Concepts do not capture the essence.