Yes, it makes a lot of sense, Katerina. Thank you for that.
It is zero that divides, and your explaining that there are two groups with a different view on zero is the work of nothing other than zero.
A definition is an artificial vehicle about actual parts contained in that definition. Being able to create an artificial vehicle is an actual part/action itself. I will not tolerate two definitions for the natural actions because the dispute should be recognized as essential to the natural actions (and essential to having the dispute in which the artificial position is often the most beneficial position).
---
Let me point you to this curious article:
Euler's number and the infinite series
1 + 1/1! + 1/2! + 1/3! + 1/4! +….
and the sum of this series is e.
I recognize that 1 is declared more or less twice here and I do not know why. Perhaps you do? I don't have the vocabulary to translate the 1 into ordinary words and the 1/1! into ordinary words in its relationship to 1. Perhaps you can help me?
I do know that people often think:
1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etcetera.
The first one is the general introduction, for instance, Mankind (no further details needed), and the second 1 is then, for instance, the 20th century, an additional introduction, with 2, 3, 4, 5 etcetera then digging deeper into the actual material.
Curious if you can help me out understanding what Euler is trying to say with these specific numbers and why the first 1 is needed.
