You know the term self-fulfilling prophecy?

Science cannot disprove God just like it is impossible to use mathematics to declare something important about the alphabet.

You are mixing different systems at will, Tony. It makes you come across less intelligent than I think you are.

Let me show you the structures and how they are completely different.

In religion, we have many different systems (pantheism, monotheism, and even a pagan duo-theism). Within the religious realm, we can pick our own system of belief therefore (or remain an outside and declare oneself to believe that there is no divine level). The structure of our belief will be religion-specific.

In science, our choices are more limited at the overall level. Either everything can be unified. Or everything cannot be unified at the largest of levels (but can potentially be unified at smaller levels). The structures available to us in science are then single platform for all there is or the lack of a single platform for all there is.

You see it already? You are comparing apples to oranges and you come to the conclusion that only oranges are true and therefore the apple is shown to not be true. We have a fact above water: The apple is not an orange, and hence (say you) the apple is not correct.

You have an assignment therefore. You need to investigate your feet because they are not based on the ground (at least not in one of the categories). You end up fixing the conclusion the way you set out thinking reality is. Both your feet are right feet, and you do not have a left foot.

You created a self-fulfilling prophecy.