You missed the Structure of Everything, Alex. Once you discuss the structure, then the truth is very easy to show.

I used ChatGPT to make my words come out better than had I written it myself.

https://medium.com/@fred-rick/chatgpt-and-the-structure-of-everything-6d1fd4a0d90a

But let me show the easy perspective on the truth here, so folks don't have to click the link.

--

Write your name on an envelope, your address, city, country, planet Earth, Solar System, Milky Way, Universe, and hand it to the postal person.

The postal person will declare that 7 items out of 8 are giving direction (are functional therefore), and that the 8th item does nothing at all but pointing to all there is, undefined but captured with the word.

I hope you see it right away. The top level inside our minds is non-functional.

Some like to add a level, and fantasize about a Multiverse. At that point (our) Universe did indeed become directional/functional for the postal person. However, we now have 9 items and the 9th item is without function.

In effect, we ignored the 8th item being non-functional, filled out a form inside our heads that made the 8th item have a function, and then we still could not get rid of the non-functional top layer. It is always there.

Long story short, we see Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems here. Or we see the philosophical conclusion that 'There is No Truth' presented to us a s a Truth.

The beauty is that there is a top layer indeed, but the top layer is either neutral/generic or it is negative.

The only certainty is uncertainty shows us a certainty, albeit a negative one.

There is no Truth shows us a truth, albeit a negative truth.

Many brilliant minds before us have already come to the same conclusion: a truth is not a truth unless its context is declared at the same time.

The example I use is Blue. It does not represent a truth yet until we declare that the context is a paint store, or that the context is the shrink and the couch. We must have the context, and that declares immediately why the Universe is failing something; there is no context in which the Universe exists.

The word Universe is simply a concept that stands on its own feet, all (different) parts included, nothing excluded (Multiverse notwithstanding, but I don't believe in unicorns other than the narwhal).

So, you did good work and I am very glad you shared this with us for contemplation, but you forgot to mention structure. It is with structural thought that we can discover where the truth hangs out.