"You (seem to) agree that forces acting collectively cannot amplify each other (just combine normally), and all the weak forces acting at vast distances from the rest of the galaxy aren't ANYWHERE near strong enough to create a phenomenon like you said."
Almost correct, Rex. You are still missing something, and that spot is not super obvious in your reversed analogy. It does help me, though, seeing what you are thinking about Model B, so it is helpful because I can pinpoint better what you prefer to avoid seeing.
Let's talk Matter and Force.
I will put hurricane next to galactic gravity, and while they are not alike, I hope you see that there are indeed Matter components and Force components for both and that should make it obvious to see what I am saying.
--
The hurricane is pure wind force and creates a non-wind spot in the center and a maximized wind spot right next to it. You have already agreed to understanding this model fully.
Matter for the hurricane is found right next door, with planet Earth. Without Earth, the hurricane would not exist of course.
Matter and Force are distinct entities, while Force is based on the presence of Matter nevertheless.
--
The gravitational force found with a galaxy is also pure force.
We find matter in the galaxy, for the force would not exist without all that matter.
With focusing just on the force with wind force and gravitational force we find a collective center in which the force is zero accompanied by the strongest expression of that force right next to it.
While based on matter, the force’s center is based on the force from a collective perspective.
--
Model B is as possible as Model A and this should be quite easy to see when we are focusing on the forces only. Take Matter out of the picture, and we automatically have that rather peculiar setting for the center of the force.
Without any additional matter, we already have that zero-spot and maximization of force right next to it.
--
Let me say this differently once more:
Do the forces cancel each other out? Yes, at the specific levels we find an incredible amount of force cancellation of each other. Yet at the collective level, there is no cancelling out because the collective reality is the collective reality. There is no additional collective reality that cancels out the first collective reality because there is just one collective reality.
When we have a group of people, then all these people represent strengths. In this particular case, all their strengths cancel each other out; these folks live in harmony.
Yet to say that there is no strength to the group because all cancel each other out is non-sense.
When another group invades the territory of our group, then we will have a show of strengths, and for sure our group is not cancelling its own forces out, but rather bundles all of it to counter the other group.
No additional person got added.
--
Mentioning the vastness of space is correct in the outward direction. For the inward direction, we actually end up with space getting more and more limited for the collective level.
If the group decided to have a political center, then most folks would not be interested in taking part in that circus. In other words, a lot of cancelling out.
Let's say there is a nation of 100 million people. Perhaps two million people are involved in politics, give or take seasonal interests during election periods. That is 98 million people cancelling one another out, politically, not active except for voting sometimes.
In the political center, there is a lot of jockeying going on, not just between parties of importance, but also inside parties of importance.
Let's say that the president has a lot of power, is found in the center of power, and we can almost see Model A, correct?
Yet, the political center is not about that person. It is about the decisions that are made, what amount of money goes where, who will be helped and who will not be helped, etcetera.
The center of politics is taken in by people. Yet the essential center of that power is the act of making decisions. A president can die and will then be replaced by the next one. This does not really interfere all too much with the decision making process.
What do we see in that center?
A bunch of sitting on their hands (zero outcomes) plus
Decisions that are all spun from that center with the greatest impacts for society. The good, the bad, and the ugly come forth from this decision-making center, including doing nothing, based on who is in control at that moment, what party or parties form the government.
The power is not from the hands of the president. The power is handed to the president by the collective.
--
So you see, Rex, that Model B is real. If you want to make a name for yourself, you would write an article with me about this and get this published.
But you are too afraid to confront Model A because you consider Model A to be without flaws.
Yet even Einstein himself was not happy about the Black Hole model. We all know that.
I am with Einstein. I am not with the ones that warped Einstein's model, ending up wagging the dog (reversing the model for the center of a galaxy).
It is up to you to see it. Again, you don't have to throw out Model A (the boy), but focus on Model B (the girl) and work with it. You and I can surprise the scientific community because they have just one eye open and are seeing just Model A. Let's combine forces and open up the other eye.
