Fred-Rick
1 min readJul 11, 2021

--

A valid point, Daniel, and I support the point fully.

However, you need to review falsification better because there is an aspect of replication contained within.

The materialization process cannot be repeated.

Many scientists demand falsification for any theory proposed about the materialization process.

End result: only golden facts (plus evidence from the field, such as the CMBR) can be produced/reproduced. But the materialization process itself cannot be reproduced.

--

I appreciate you being the advocate of the devil, but my request to you is then to do that twice:

* once for the scientists demanding falsification;

* once for a proposal how the prior state of the universe ended using all known facts.

https://fred-rick.medium.com/the-big-whisper-theory-for-dummies-38333ffabe0c

I do not demand you become a supporter of the Big Whisper theory, but it is one example where it is clear to me that scientists want their cake and eat it two times.

In the Big Bang theory, they walk their facts straight back into the prior realm, but when I use all matter in the universe as the reason for an inward motion first (Newton: what goes in, must come out), they gag me and demand falsification.

--

--

Fred-Rick
Fred-Rick

Responses (1)