I like your thinking outside the box, Chris. But for one, I claim that gravity is nothing but the synergistic outcome of the other forces.
Follow me in this simple analogy:
* Mothers
* Fathers
* Children
* Families
These can all be associated with a force. The force of mothers is well known, and quite different from the force of fathers, the force of children and the force of families.
But notice how we have four distinct forces but people that all populate two groups. All mothers, fathers and children can be found again with the families.
* Weak-nuclear force
* Strong-nuclear force
* Electromagnetic force
* Gravitational force
There is no reason to look for a fourth source, because the fourth force can already be explained by the other sources.
That brings me to the other part: the model of the universe. The one we have right now is not correct.
If we look at the Earth, then it is involved in four motions, but only three are based on gravity. The fourth one is not.
* Earth's spin
* Earth's revolution around the Sun
* Earth's dancing along with the circular motion of the Milky Way
* Earth's speeding along with the one-directional motion of the Milky Way
This last motion is the fastest. We are zipping from where we came from to where we are going. This motion is not based on gravity, but on the initial push we got in the materialization process; nothing stopped it.
If we go back to the materialization process, then we should agree that Big Bang theorists are not the smartest. They all agree that the result is an 'omelet' and yet they can't agree that there was an 'egg' first.
The beauty of using the 'egg' analogy is that we can see immediately that the egg has to get broken before we can make an omelet.
Breaking the egg is not based on the process of making an omelet. It is an a-priori, and only then do we worry about making the omelet. The materialization process was a two-step occurrence. One to break the prior state, and one to establish matter (from some and not all).
In the Big Bang theory, scientists don't break the egg, but they still get themselves to the omelet. That makes no sense.
So, let's keep it simple. We need to discuss the universal model first before we dive to the level of the details. Because, if we don't get the model right, then the details will definitively be incorrect.
'The Big Bang Egg'
