My main objection with physicists is that they appear to be talking around the big picture instead of about the big picture itself. As such, I am not a fan of scientists because I think they keep closing one eye and therefore miss that very important aspect of depth in their vision.
Consider the simple question where matter came from? It is amazing that the Big Bang does not address this question but immediately moves toward the second part of how it came about (and then misses the essence). This is all very easy to show.
Most everyone accepts that matter is a result, and we can translate this into 'omelet'. Immediately, we know that there once was an 'egg' even when we have no good idea what that 'egg' was like. We have two structural aspects therefore:
* A Source
* A Fundamental breaking among that Source
Amazingly, the Big Bang structure does not contain a breakage; it is therefore impossible to understand what happened. It's like they want the egg to become the omelet without breaking the egg -- that is not possible. They skip a step.
Physicists are looking for an answer by investigating the results only. The 'omelet' is not going to declare how the 'egg' broke. We need to use our brains to understand how the 'egg' broke. The joke I sometimes use is that scientists are investigating babies to figure out how babies are made. That is not how you figure that one out.
--
In the Big Whisper theory, scientific data and evidence is used to come to a completed view, yet structural thought is moved to the forefront. Prior to the materialization process, we need to find a reason how or why a fundamental break occurred in the prior state of the universe of which we know so little.
Structurally, it is actually quite simple. Yet the model will be a remodeled outcome for certain compared to the Big Bang model.
The Big Whisper does not have:
* a super-hot starting point
* a cosmic inflation scenario
It does have:
* extreme densities
* energy as the source
* parts of the energy becoming quarks
First, why we know for certain that the 'egg' broke, and then how it got done.
Matter is a fundamentally distinct outcome from Energy. We can declare Matter a version of Energy, but not the same as Energy in its pure format. An establishment occurred among Energy, which we call Matter. Therefore, a line in the sand had to get crossed that should not have been crossed. One cannot get Matter from Energy when Energy was not actively involved. Matter tells us that a line got crossed within a prior Energized state. The ‘egg’ did get indeed broken because we could not have gotten an ‘omelet’ otherwise, and for sure we got an ‘omelet’.
Then the how.
The resulting outcome of matter moving outwardly from a collective perspective tells us something very important about how the 'egg' broke. With the opposite direction, of a collective inward motion, we have a structural scenario that contains a floor where prior there was no floor. Something new is created when a collective moves inwardly and does not stop by itself, because it will then get stopped by all motion moving inwardly to one central and highly concentrated center that is then fully stuck in place.
Yet it is not the center where Matter came about.
With Energy as the source, and accepting that this Energy was uniform to some extent, we have a center that is locked in place, not budging, not transforming, just stuck.
Then, the collective inward motion would only be able to hold a very large amount of energy fully stuck in place and then automatically find the border where some of the energy could not get stuck in place any further. The tiniest bit of fraction is already enough to turn this additional Zone into a wobbly Zone.
Let's call the center Zone 1, and this Zone right next to it Zone 2. Zone 2 is where original energy got churned into quarks.
We all know that quarks do not exist by themselves. So, the churning into quarks occurred under extreme circumstances, and remained stuck in Zone 2, except that this set the stage for the materialization process.
With the occurrence of quarks, the collective inward motion experienced a shockwave, and this shockwave traveled through the entire collective inward motion all the way to the outer areas where the inward motion was actually not all that strong to begin with. The shockwave knocked just this outer area out, and this caused a relief wave to move through the inward collective. There will be a 'Yellowstone Old Faithful' moment, and all that was held tightly together in the center catapulted outwardly as soon as that tiny bit of relief came around.
All energy of Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 (which is the largest setting) catapulted outwardly.
As soon as Zone 2 and all these quarks have the tiniest amount of space to move about, the quarks align themselves into the neutrons and protons. This can be proposed to have happened at the CMBR location.
Then, because the protons have a positive charge, the electrons are pulled in from Zone 1 and Zone 3 to neutralize that charge. As such, we have two different parts of matter: quarks and electrons. And neither exists by itself. Electrons and protons are paired, but not tied to the hip.
We have a QM that is charged, and a universe that is neutral from an overall perspective.
In this Big Whisper scenario, there is no super-hot process involved (but there is some heat involved of course) because the adiabatic cooling process does not occur over a distance of 380,000 years, but over a far shorter distance.
Zone 2 is not found in the mathematical center, and even Zone 1 could potentially have contained a Zone 0 as well. Good architecture establishes a solid bridge high above a valley, and the collective inward motion could have established such a bridge for Zone 1. The story for Zone 2 remains the same whether there was a Zone 0 or not.
-
That's the Big Whisper model in a nutshell. I did get a few people to peer review it (via the internet, not via any scientific channels) and it was declared scientifically possible. Next? Silence. Always that silence because folks can't focus long enough on the model somehow.
So, I am also no enamored with scientists/physicists because they are not smart enough to get themselves outside their smart boxes. They are super knowledgeable about their own trees, but they assume to understand the forest. They think the universe is a forest and they don't consider the question if the forest parts may be limited, chopped in sections; they think it is a contiguous reality. Physicists don’t break the ‘egg’.
'The Big Bang Egg'
