There are two forms of Science, K. The golden standard of science, and the silver standard of science. Asking for falsification in the golden standard is fine. Asking for falsification, however, in the silver standard of science is incorrect.

Archaeology is a good example of silver science. One cannot repeat a find. Asking for falsification of an idea how several finds are linked makes very little sense. Only in areas where results can be repeated should we ask for falsification.

Same silver conditions for the materialization process. All scientists agree that matter is a result, and yet way too many are demanding falsification for a theory about the ending of the prior state of the universe. That is an incorrect demand. Naturally, golden facts can get placed in the silver arena of science, but that does not make the silver setting golden.

I have bumped into this problem a lot when presenting the Big Whisper theory, which explains the reason for matter as the result of an inward motion that did not stop at the end of the prior state of the universe. Matter is then damaged original energy.

I cannot tell you how many doors got closed simply because falsification is not possible. The truth (sic) is that one cannot falsify in the prior state of the universe. This is a silver area for science because the materialization process itself cannot be repeated.

https://fred-rick.medium.com/the-big-whisper-theory-for-dummies-38333ffabe0c

If interested in the theory that is different than the Big Bang theory or the Cyclic theory (the two main competitors of the Big Whisper theory.