Very good, with one exception to the word infinite, Moshe. To undermine it directly, it is a concept that ends up not containing anything, while the brain accepts it still as if something is truly there.

Halving an apple and halving that half, and doing this infinitely, ends up being an impossible exercise after about 40 half-cuttings. For sure, after 100 cutting halves in halves, there is no 'there' there anymore.

-- That said, I agree with you, and we should have multiple proposals for one and the same set of facts. Then, we can compare them and see which ones are most logical (and supported by facts).

-- That said, facts may be true but inappropriately used, such as declaring it true that water boils at 100 degrees Celsius while completely not applicable to the thawing process of permafrost.

-- That said, there are also distinct realms within science.

*Gold standard realm of science: one can demand falsification for whatever is proposed.

* Silver standard realm of science: one cannot demand falsification for whatever is proposed.

Example of a silver science discipline: Archaeology. Artifacts cannot be repeated. One can do the findings, but one cannot replicate the findings. Proposing a correlation among these finds cannot be undermined with the argument that 20,000 years of missing artifacts means the proposal must be invalidated. One cannot demand falsification; one cannot demand evidence for each and every year that plant or animal species X roamed the planet.

In silver settings, the scientific emperor cannot demand the gold standard.

I am declaring all of this because scientists are gagging my Big Whisper theory with that false argument, demanding gold when silver is all there is. They are censoring me, excluding me from the discussion.

https://fred-rick.medium.com/the-big-whisper-theory-for-dummies-38333ffabe0c

Here is my latest article, if interested in the proposed inward motion at the end of the prior state of the universe (Newton would have approved: What goes in, must come out). The fine and immediate detail is that matter is then not the whole of the prior state, but only those parts that got damaged in the inward motion.

Thanks again for your good remark.