Yes the Big Bang model is incorrect in points, but not in overall scope. The similar more-accurate alternative must be called something differently because different indeed (and in my case it's called the Big Whisper model based on Penzias and Wilson who discovered the whisper of the materialization process), yet the overall premise is correct, just not the details.
To come to a galaxy, we need relatively few years, depending on what we start out from.
In the Big Bang model, an enormous amount of stages are incorporated. In the Big Whisper model, all that took place 13.8 billion years ago was the localized transformation of original energy into quarks (in Zone 2).
Once it is realized that the materialization process was not one of creation, but rather one just of transformation (and quarks then being the same as damaged original energy), then 300 million years after the materialization process is way longer than what is required to form a galaxy.
When a bucket of water is thrown off the third floor, it has become rain before it hits the ground. A galaxy could have formed in probably less than a million years.
So, it all depends on the model we start out with, and the Big Whisper model is the much-improved Big Bang model -- it is simply about the (partial) transformation of original energy into damaged energy: the quarks.
--
Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater, Glenn.
Here is a simple three minute article about the required structure of the materialization process that the current Big Bang model does not touch.
'The Missing Big Bang Egg'
